Gupta Wessler PLLC is a national appellate, constitutional, and complex litigation boutique. We brief and argue high-stakes cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and courts across the country. Through all of our efforts, we aim to help shape the law in ways that enhance justice and improve people’s lives.

____________________________________

An “impressive” and “highly rated appellate practice,” known for “terrific briefs” and “incredible oral advocacy.” — Chambers USA

Gupta Wessler has “staked a name for itself” as the nation’s “premier plaintiffs-side appellate firm.” – Law 360

____________________________________

____________________________________
Our advocacy before the U.S. Supreme Court for plaintiffs and public interest clients continues to produce wins and accolades. Gupta Wessler was named a National Law Journal “2020 Appellate Hot List” honoree and recipient of the 2020 Pound Civil Justice Institute’s Appellate Advocacy Award, which “recognizes excellence in appellate advocacy in America,” for work that led to two separate U.S. Supreme Court wins by three of our lawyers.
In March 2021, Deepak Gupta argued and won a landmark victory for access to justice in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District, in which the Justices unanimously ruled that people injured by mass-market products may sue where their injury occurred, bucking a decades-long trend of anti-plaintiff decisions. In 2020, Matt Wessler argued and won a 9-0 victory for workers seeking to hold companies accountable under ERISA for risking their retirement savings. And in 2019, Deepak had the honor of being invited by the Court to present argument in support of a judgment left undefended by the Solicitor General.
In another recent Supreme Court term, Gupta Wessler served as counsel of record in three merits cases and prevailed in two, securing certiorari and reversal for our clients, and Empirical SCOTUS ranked one of our merits briefs the single most readable brief of the term.
____________________________________

The introduction of Gupta Wessler’s “impressive team” into a legal battle against a large corporate adversary means that “the opposing parties’ legal forces have been equalized” in the “arena of appellate combat.” — Bloomberg Businessweek

____________________________________
In the lower courts, Gupta Wessler continues to rack up major appellate victories nationwide—on class actions, antitrust, consumer and workers’ rights, civil rights, federal preemption, and a range of other issues.
A historic Federal Circuit win against the federal court system for overcharging people by hundreds of millions for access to electronic records. A Seventh Circuit win allowing military reservists to sue over pay discrimination. A Fourth Circuit affirmance of a rare $60 million class-action jury verdict for consumers. An Eighth Circuit ruling rejecting immunity for cities that use jail to make poor people pay fines. Rulings from multiple circuits invalidating forced arbitration clauses in various settings—mobile apps, privatized criminal justice, and tribal internet lending.
____________________________________

A “vibrant appellate practice focused on public interest cases and plaintiff-side representations.” — Chambers USA

____________________________________
We’ve also scored big recent wins in constitutional and administrative litigation.
We persuaded the D.C. Circuit to issue an emergency order halting the U.S. Agency for Global Media’s attempted takeover of the Open Technology Fund, a global internet-freedom nonprofit. We successfully represented environmental groups in an APA challenge to a midnight rule that would have crippled the EPA’s ability to rely on science in setting public-health standards. We obtained a ruling striking down an IRS decision to stop collecting donor information from dark-money campaign-finance groups. We established that Trump’s Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management had been serving unlawfully for 424 days. And, in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics v. Trump, we persuaded the Second Circuit that competitors of Donald Trump’s hotels had standing to sue him for accepting payments from foreign and domestic governments in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clauses.
____________________________________

“The difference with Deepak and with Gupta Wessler is that the firm is very well known as very strong in consumer rights appeals and they have a lot of Supreme Court experience. Gupta’s increasing presence in the Supreme Court . . . is particularly notable because of the small size and boutique nature of the firm.” – Empirical SCOTUS

____________________________________