Emoluments Clause Litigation 

Gupta Wessler PLLC is proud to be working with a team of top ethics experts, constitutional scholars, and litigators to challenge the constitutionality of Donald Trump’s acceptance of payments from government officials through his private businesses. We are litigating two separate cases—a suit by private plaintiffs (filed in New York in January) and a suit by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia (filed in Maryland in June).
The Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits federal officials from accepting “any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever” from any foreign governments, including foreign government-owned businesses, without Congress’s consent. The Domestic Emoluments Clause provides that the President’s “Compensation” shall not be supplemented by any “other emolument from the United States, or any of them.”
We argue that the President is violating these clauses in a number of ways, including through patronage by foreign and domestic governments at the Trump International Hotels in Washington, D.C. and New York, leases held by foreign governments at New York’s Trump Tower, and other business dealings in foreign countries.
In addition to ​Deepak Gupta, Jonathan Taylor, and Joshua Matz of Gupta Wessler, our legal team includes CREW’s board chair and vice-chair Norman Eisen and Richard Painter (the top White House ethics lawyers under Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, respectively); leading ​c​onstitutional law scholars Laurence Tribe, Zephyr Teachout, and Erwin Chemerinsky; and trial litigators from the Cohen Milstein law firm.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, et al. v. Trump (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York): 
In this case, our clients—the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a hotel and restaurant owner (Eric Goode), a hotel-event booker (Jill Phaneuf), and an association of hundreds of restaurants and thousands of restaurant workers (ROC United)—challenge President Trump’s violations of both the U.S. Constitution’s Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses. The suit seeks an injunction to put a stop to the president’s constitutional violations.
Deepak Gupta presented oral argument in New York on October 18, 2017. The case is now headed towards an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Motion to Dismiss | Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss | Government’s Reply
Second Amended Complaint
Amicus Brief of Former Government Ethics Officials
Amicus Brief of Scholars of Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, and Federal Jurisdiction
Amicus Brief of Members of Congress
Amicus Brief of Legal Historians
Amicus Brief of Sarah Chayes
Amicus Brief of Seth Barrett Tillman
District of Columbia and Maryland v. Trump (U.S. District Court of the District of Maryland):
Gupta Wessler PLLC is also representing the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland in parallel litigation filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland by D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh. This lawsuit was filed in June 2017. The government’s motion to dismiss was filed on September 27, 2017, and our opposition to the motion was filed on November 7, 2017. Oral argument was held on January 25, 2018, and a decision is pending.
Opinion Finding Article III Standing
Motion to Dismiss | Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss
Scheduling Motion
Frequently Asked Questions
Blumenthal, et al. v. Trump (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia):
A third case alleging violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause was filed by more than two hundred members of Congress. They are represented by Brianne Gorod and her colleagues at the Constitutional Accountability Center.